http://yoursdp.org/ Fri, 10 Sep 2010 05:16:37 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1038#josc7986 Wonder if he will sue Saint Peter if he does not got to go to heaven. Carlson Mon, 15 Sep 2008 06:47:09 +0100 http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1038#josc7949 This LKY will one day do S'pore's reputation in. I'm starting to be ashamed of being S'porean. ah beng Sun, 14 Sep 2008 10:30:40 +0100 http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1038#josc7935 [quote]On the one hand, he had better sue, or by his own purported reasons for suing, if he did not sue, then people would assume that Wall Street Journal articles are right. One the other hand, when he does sue, and wins, it would only confirm yet again, in the minds of the already suspicious, that the judiciary is not independent.[/quote] Is pissing off Rupert Murdoch a good move? Expect a media war in the State Times and an unflattering "profile" of Mr Murdoch in days to come. And the race/colonist card (despite Murdoch being an Aussie). Uncle Ver SG Sat, 13 Sep 2008 20:48:49 +0100 http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1038#josc7931 Look who is causing Singapore harm now? Sue foreigners here, victory is almost certain. But to become a laughing stock behind their smiles of diplomacy? How much more must be spent to buy respect with the people's money. It's really a bottomless pit in one way and a limited depth in another. The reader decides which is which. ahsayman Sat, 13 Sep 2008 18:16:22 +0100 http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1038#josc7928 What's wrong with those editorials?! Contempt of the courts????????? Anon Sat, 13 Sep 2008 16:18:45 +0100 http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1038#josc7927 This is a farse! The Judiciary should just sue LBA instead as it wasn't the WSJ who produced that damning report....but i guess they knew very well that they are not going to get very far with sueing the LBA. Well, if you can't beat the big man, punch up his little brothers instead! Sat, 13 Sep 2008 15:47:15 +0100 http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1038#josc7924 The IBA or others can sue the Lees in London. If the Lees are able to call them in, I am sure others can call them out too. Lees must get people who have this principle in life - "If you can, I can" AnnA Sat, 13 Sep 2008 12:41:48 +0100 http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1038#josc7921 So who is to judge this libel suit that allegedly "impugn the impartiality, integrity and independence of the Singapore Judiciary."? The Singapore Judiciary? That'd be a conflict of interest. Chew Sat, 13 Sep 2008 11:44:49 +0100 http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1038#josc7919 If he can win the law suit in a first world country ... I will quit winning this website. anon Sat, 13 Sep 2008 10:29:00 +0100 http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1038#josc7914 Lee seems to be caught a trap of his own making. On the one hand, he had better sue, or by his own purported reasons for suing, if he did not sue, then people would assume that Wall Street Journal articles are right. One the other hand, when he does sue, and wins, it would only confirm yet again, in the minds of the already suspicious, that the judiciary is not independent. Not very clever, politically. Or, 'you reap what you sow', or, from the viewpoint of 'Asian values', it is the law of karma. Tan Tai Wei Sat, 13 Sep 2008 09:12:38 +0100 http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1038#josc7911 Even though the articles were seemingly accurate to a certain degree. Like Lee said, the government is PAP and PAP is Singapore. Hence, it's rather unfortunate, tax payers money will be used (again) for Lees egoistical purposes. ;-P reader Sat, 13 Sep 2008 04:43:07 +0100 http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1038#josc7908 Why don't IBA or other human rights group or those 'westeners' sue the Lees back for accusing them for trying "to-do-us-in"?? Why not let them taste their own medicine? AnnA Sat, 13 Sep 2008 03:38:01 +0100