<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.w3.org/2000/08/w3c-synd/style.css" type="text/css"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>No credible people in the opposition? - comments</title>
		<description></description>
		<link>http://yoursdp.org/</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:15:35 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>to jason</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc7184</link>
			<description>helloo PAP brigadier!</description>
			<author>husrin</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:35:04 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Are U Fit&gt;?</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc6686</link>
			<description>From the moments u went on a hunger strike I was startled who is this man.But to my very surprised,it was a man with an issuse of being sacked from work, unfairly.My god, why use the hunger-strike unless u are a man of great contribution to a society but not so. The worst to come is u become an opposition, not a very good one I say.From my view you are the worst of all opposition parties, u dare this and that does amount u an out-standing politician. A good politician put fore his ideal with pro and con for the people to decide. What u are doing is v naive, make your move without being charges can u? If U become the ruling Party I can't imaging what Singapore will be.</description>
			<author>jason</author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:59:15 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>SDP got credible people?</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5794</link>
			<description>Not trying to attack, but face it... Does SDP have people ready to govern properly or not if really elected?

Governing is not like you see Mr X buay song, and you go scold, go protest, go march... or you think that chap not your gang so must be enemy.

Naturally, what credible reasons have SDP offered for ousting credible opposition boss Chiam? Or do you have credible response to this error?

Life is getting harder, but that doesn't mean it is getting easier to choose SDP.

Many people tok about what human rights... What human rights are they preaching? Who really understand that human rights requires thinking people with greater virtue!

How?</description>
			<author>Elfred</author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:51:28 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Supreme and Great Leader</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5723</link>
			<description>Why are there so many frequent and critical remarks--couched in words of sarcasm, resentment, derogatoriness and hostility--against the PAP Government and its leaders (especially Lee Kuan Yew) by a growing number of Singaporeans in their usually hasty and impulsive comments on articles and reports in this website?

Isn't Lee Kuan Yew a leader with great social and emotional intelligence--to use a concept taken from modern psychologists? Isn't he well-endowed in this respect--for his ability to make and win friends from all classes of society--without racial, religious, linguistic and cultural distinctions-- and from all kinds of national leaders from all over the world? So if he is so friendly, if he has so high a social and emotional intelligence, then why has he failed to win friends from those who support the opposition? 

Is it just a question of ideological differences then--an intellectual gap that cannot simply be overcome or closed by sheer friendliness? Poor Lee, why do so many people dislike and detest him so vehemently? What has he done to our citizens, this great and honourable man? Not only is he an able leader, but he is also GOOD! Yes, he wants all his chosen leaders to be good--so that they can form a good government! After all, did he not say, in his book, &quot;From Third World To First&quot;, in the chapter on &quot;Passing the Baton&quot; (pp. 736-7), that &quot;Leadership is more than just ability. It is a combination of courage, determination, commitment, character and ability that makes people willing to follow a leader. We needed people who were activists with good judgement and interpersonal skills.&quot;

Ah, &quot;interpersonal skills&quot; indeed, sir! If you have such wonderful and great &quot;interpersonal skills&quot;, then how come you have made so many enemies among your own citizens--not to mention those liberal bastards and welfare-championing and freedom-championing scums from the West? 

Yes, and I want to ask this question: Are we paying your &quot;good and able&quot; leaders (for goodness and ability are the two indispensable qualities which you desired from your chosen leaders) such an unacceptably high salary for their &quot;goodness&quot; or for their debatable &quot;ability&quot;--or for both?

But surely, it can't be for both! After all, goodness requires no monetary incentives: If you are really &quot;good&quot;, then why do you want so much money for yourself? Are you not serving the people rather than your own self-interests? 

Therefore, it must be for your &quot;ability&quot;! Yes, we are paying you such an enormously high salary because you are such an able leader--so much so that you can let a detained Muslim extremist (declared a very dangerous man by the government) run away and escape from the prison authorities! 

But is this only one example of your &quot;ability&quot;? There are many more, but I just can't put them down in this posting--for fear of embarassing and humiliating you further! Yes, unlike you, Mr Lee Kuan Yew, I am a compassionate man. I don't like to cause unnecessary sufferings--emotional or social--to other people. Especially one who is so highly distinguished as you undeniably are--with your great intellectual brilliance, and not to mention your courage, determination, commitment, character, good judgemental skills, and, above all, terrific interpersonal skills! I salute you, my Supreme and Great Leader!</description>
			<author>CHUA CHUAN SEAH</author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:59:12 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Monster LKY -out to Kill Him</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5702</link>
			<description>[b]Well looks like dirty old LKY is up to his demonic tricks again with JBJ-

He might be using his Suing machinery against JBJ by the looks of it!

Monster LKY is out to kill any and/or all Oppositions no matter what!

Poor JBJ another victim!

When will Singapore ever get out of the hand of dirty LKY?????

When will we ever be redeemed????[/b]</description>
			<author>Poor JBJ another victim!</author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:01:16 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>[No Title]</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5695</link>
			<description>Dear Singapore Democratician, 
I am particular digusted by your action although i am not in all favour of what the PAP does. But what disgusted me most is,you guys bring politics down to the level of Kopitiam. Your action have really proven what LKY said, I hope that you can brace yourself and prove something and stop gaining votes by defaming, make small of others and your propaganda.

Thanks

***************************************

&quot;and stop gaining votes by defaming, make small of others and your propaganda.'


Dear Please Stand Up,

Those actions were precisely what the PAP had done so far to the opposition through Straits Times all these years, and I think CSJ got the most shit from the old man. if you are still standing up reading this.

Please wake up! Don't fall into the PAP brainwashing territory by reading THEIR OWN NEWSPAPERS! Cannot be trusted at all!</description>
			<author>someone sad</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:55:27 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Credibility what!</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5694</link>
			<description>First of all what this fuss about credible opposition! Credibility in terms of what, educational qualification! Previous work experience! Commitment to the country! Commitment towards the people!

This whole topic of having credible shadow team makes me laugh until burst. Talking about having shadow cabinet of parliamentary democracy like UK! UK is a matured functioning democracy over hundred years and Singapore it’s barely a Single Party System! Singapore needs to have proper institutions like vibrant media (not state controlled), independent bureaucratic, technocratic structures in place for various government institutions, which will support the politicians, understand the concept, politicians not necessarily have to be bureaucrats. Politicians should understand people, policy implementations to be done by government officers who would not change with the change in government. If the government is so proud of their talented ministers, (well somehow they get sky touching pay packs) are they able enough to work in the corporate world! Look around the top financial, technology based multi national organisations in Singapore, how many of local talents work in top level! How many of Singaporeans even in terms of numbers in the financial organisations where Singapore government invests heavily (Merrill, Citi, UBS). Rarely, Singaporeans are there anywhere above middle management. So take foreign talents as ministers that would be the best meritorious government anybody could ever imagine!</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:24:58 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Perception of Credibility?</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5690</link>
			<description>[quote=anoymous]I wonder how many SDP party members are good credible candidates - not polytechnic/ITE or below education but people with good degrees and holding major portfolios in banks, finance company, senior lawyers, academics (besides chee sj who was fired), doctors?  Can SDP tell us How many ?

  SO THAT we can see how SDP has gone from strength to strength, built on real solid foundation[/quote]

You had defined good and credible as someone having good degrees and holding major portfolios in banks, finance company, senior lawyers, academics or doctors.

Now tell me, do you meet the above criteria you had set yourself? No, then by your own standard you are not good and credible. Does your parents meet the above criteria? No? Then they are not good or credible either. 

If judged by your perceived standards of credibility, many people in Singapore would had been consider bad and not credible. Then why are banks still willing to lend them money, financing their homes, or do you mean that Singapore banks are not banks but charities? Just like Singapore's meritocracy appears to be mere hypocrisy?

Please wake up.

The only qualification any Singaporean needs is being a Singapore citizen and the determination to improve the lives of the people. Flashy degrees, selfish souls and greedy hearts are the source of bad self-serving policies that serve no real purpose and bleeds the people dry. Think &quot;GST is to help the poor (ministers)&quot; and &quot;ERP will reduce congestion (for the rich and elites)&quot; as well as &quot;Get out of my elite uncaring face&quot; attitude that PAP had shown everyone.

The people of Singapore need someone who speaks out for them from the heart and in their language. And that has nothing to do with good degrees or impressive portfolios.</description>
			<author>Chew</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:29:22 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Please stand up</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5689</link>
			<description>Dear Singapore Democratician, 
  I am particular digusted by your action although i am not in all favour of what the PAP does. But what disgusted me most is,you guys bring politics down to the level of Kopitiam. Your action have really proven what LKY said, I hope that you can brace yourself and prove something and stop gaining votes by defaming, make small of others and your propaganda.

Thanks</description>
			<author>Annoymous</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:26:33 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>re: re:</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5686</link>
			<description>[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Cool down, people. 
National Day is here.
Time to sing an ALTERNATE NDP song
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HpeTQY_xo0[/quote]

Good work. 

Take a revision of the HOTA vitim, 
Sim Tee Hua in Feb 2007 too.[/quote]

In youtube:

被指脑死, 家属与医院冲突, 
Brain-dead man's kin in scuffle
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TX7FDM5YWDE

Blood Loss to death after birth
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3eHLZ6Rg_w

1-The Shameless LIAR- 
IBA letter &amp; Report
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRteulDRrlk

2-Court of Injustice-
The Shameless LIAR LKY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezgKLrSxkdk</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:33:58 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>re: REAL STATISTICS</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5685</link>
			<description>[quote=anoymous]I wonder how many SDP party members are good credible candidates - not polytechnic/ITE or below education but people with good degrees and holding major portfolios in banks, finance company, senior lawyers, academics (besides chee sj who was fired), doctors?  Can SDP tell us How many ?
[/quote]

Anoymous [sic], 
I feel your are elitist.
Are you talking about cadidates with credibility .... or candidates with good education ?
Good education does not equate to good cridibility.

Neither does holding portfolios in banks, etc .... 

There are even people holding both good degrees and good positions but whose credibility are questionable.</description>
			<author>NiceSow</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:15:27 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>VERY STRANGE HAPPENING???</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5684</link>
			<description>[b]S$1m reward for information leading to capture of Mas Selamat:

the good joke is after months 2 anonymous guys come up with such offers???

Very very strange= WKS so happy???[/b]</description>
			<author>S$1m reward for information</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:32:04 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Devil</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5683</link>
			<description>[b]&quot;Dirty harry has brought great disgrace for the chinese and especially his own hakkas clan. He has already sold his soul to the devil .lost his humanity to greed and power &quot;[/b]</description>
			<author>Disgrace-Dirty Harry</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:26:18 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NO ANSWER!</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5682</link>
			<description>[b]Father Lee is the author of the Singapore System so he will defend Stinkapore and say Singapore is the Best!  No By Elections!

Son Lee will repeat like a parrot after the son and say the same thing- No By Election!

All other Puppets in the Cabinets paid for nothing will repeat the same thing!

There goes the answer to Sinkaporeans!

SAME OLD STORY!![/b]</description>
			<author>SAME OLD PAP STORY</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:00:35 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Well Done JBJ - another oppostion</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5681</link>
			<description>[b]Well Done JBJ- As usual PAP times tried to slander his letter in a negative light!

But whatever it is the thruth is there should be a by-election! 
Thats all there is to it!

PAP answer pls to JBJ! And no more games or defamtions suits![/b]</description>
			<author>Just simples answers no games!</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:36:08 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>BRING IN MORE OPPOSITIONS</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5680</link>
			<description>[color=maroon][b]One WP Candidate asks Minister Shan Question  and the way he answers so arrogantly!

That is what he is paid to do!  Mr Shan remember that! Otherwise go back and sleep !

That is why we need more oppositions in! One or 2 for what!

Must need 40 or 50 more![/b][/color]</description>
			<author>PAP MINISTERS SHOW TOO MUCH AR</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:32:31 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>[No Title]</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5679</link>
			<description>[b]More and more pp'le are complaining to SPower about the high and exhorbitant Utility Bills but look at the arrogance of the SP- and the way they explain?

All bec they come under the same ruling party and same power!

No checks and balances![/b]</description>
			<author>Singapore Power -more complain</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:29:54 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>A BY-ELELCTION</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5678</link>
			<description>[color=blue][b]Dear Friends,

JBJ has challenged PAP Regime to a a by-election at the late MP's electorate!

Lets see if PM LHL will take up the challenge or will his Papa allow ??

THAT SHOULD BE THE WAY TO GO!

[/b][/color]</description>
			<author>JBJ THROWS A CHALLENGE TO PAP</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:27:26 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>REAL STATISTICS</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5673</link>
			<description>I wonder how many SDP party members are good credible candidates - not polytechnic/ITE or below education but people with good degrees and holding major portfolios in banks, finance company, senior lawyers, academics (besides chee sj who was fired), doctors?  Can SDP tell us How many ?

  SO THAT we can see how SDP has gone from strength to strength, built on real solid foundation</description>
			<author>anoymous</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 00:37:17 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>re:</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5671</link>
			<description>[quote=Anonymous]Cool down, people. 
National Day is here.
Time to sing an ALTERNATE NDP song
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HpeTQY_xo0[/quote]

Good work. 

Take a revision of the HOTA vitim, 
Sim Tee Hua in Feb 2007 too.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 23:24:02 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>We Have Expelled LKY</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5670</link>
			<description>This is genuine Hakka man talking.  

I just wanted to let you, those who are below the age of 45, know about the SIN committed by LKY against Hakka people and his ancestors. 

In late 60's, early 70's.  Lee forcibly took away our high valued cemetry known as 丰永达at Holland Road (near the new Methodist girl school).  The excuse that he used was to convert this land into a Container Port.  Haha, container port in Holland Road bungalow area. 

This was non-sense.  I was told that the Clan went to plead with him to no avail.  

Clan people said that he wanted to show to non-Hakka people how firm he was against his own Hakka people.  Since then, we Hakka people had, unofficially, expelled him from the Clan. 

Now, forty years later, the land still remained unused or used by people to fly kites or remote control aeroplanes.

For those who doubt my story, just go and speak to any Hakka men of the age of 60 and above or take a drive along Holland Road Bungalow area.

Don't u guys called that man Hakka... Pui...</description>
			<author>REAL HAKKA</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 23:00:11 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>[No Title]</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5668</link>
			<description>[quote]National Day is here.[/quote]

What NATIONAL day? Whose national day? Not mine, that's for sure. My ancestors didn't get to vote in a NATIONAL referendum to say we anted INDEPENDENCE.

Or to leave the federation.

Worse, to get booted out unceremoniously by a perpetually half-drunk Malay who calls himself a prince and a prime minister!!!!

If anything, it ought rightly be called
[size=large][b][color=fuchsia]NATIONAL SHAME DAY
or
NATIONAL SHAM (by Lee Kuan Yew) DAY![/color][/b][/size]

Why not call it Panasonic Day? Or Matsushita Day - rather be asociated with a wise Japanese visionary-cum-entrepreneur than a Hakka opportunist anytime, man</description>
			<author>Down With Singapore Hakka Lees</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:59:37 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RE: Shiyun</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5667</link>
			<description>Yea and thanks to them too, we have not attained the &quot;Swiss standard&quot; of living by 1999 as boldly predicted by Kuan Yew... 

Thanks to them that we got a wanted JI leader on the loose( or was he dead long ago?)... 

Thanks to them SG entered the Book of Records for highest paid ministers (&quot;give a thief what he wants to steal so that he wont steal it huh???)

Thanks to them, we have our GLC squandering billions of $$$ for 'whacthayacallit' investments...

Thanks to them, we have Ministers of integrity (does that mean that HE can lie in Court?)...

Thanks to them, we have ERP that does not really solve road-congestion problems...

Thanks to them, we are one of the top 5 in the world for population density... (so squeezy)

Thanks to them, we have foreigners coming in to help locals keep their jobs (wow...magical?)... And erm...they take away University students places too(?)...

Thanks to them, we have Election Boundaries magically changing during elections (cheating much??)...

Thanks to them, we still have old old people working (dignity of employment???)

Thanks to them, our ex-President Ong wasn't given a State funeral(some sort of mockery just because Mr Ong questioned the Reserve funds???)

Thanks to them, we have a Kangaroo Court...

Thanks to them, we have learnt how to churn out excuses next time something goes wrong (inaccuracies, lapse, let's move on, sorry that it had happened etc...)

Thanks to them, we have brain-washed people like you (and did you mention the word 'Dynasty'??? ; Nepotism much???)

And the list goes on...

Choose any one to rebutt; every 'pea-brainer' here wants to hear them. (since you labelled all of us here pea-brainers, we assume you are sooo smart so please enlighten us on some of the issues here.)</description>
			<author>Eeeediot</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:57:56 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>[No Title]</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5666</link>
			<description>[quote]Even Workers' Party Chairman Sylvia Lim concurs, saying that the opposition needs to “focus on getting credible people elected into Parliament.”[/quote]

Oh dear, here goes another, another turncoat - and it's the WP again! Heehee, why isn't anyone surprised?

If she means what she said about getting 'credible' people into the Opposition - let's make that Parliament for the even greater good of the people - then the first hing she should do is to purge her own party of turncoats, non-credible figures.

Start by dropping the heads of that can't-stand-up-to-and-stare-down-Lee-Hsien-Loong-and-Wong-Kan-Seng's-verbal-'threats' of a meek Opposition 'leader', Hougang tiochiu balls-less boy Low Thia Khiang and that equally balls-less (dunno-vote-for-PAP-correct-or-vote-for-own-Opposition-comrade-correct) political novice and opportunist of a Yaw Yaw See Yaw Shin Leong.</description>
			<author>Big Trumpet Tan KL</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:53:33 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Flush 'em out - Singapore on Oct 4?</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5664</link>
			<description>[quote]Harry entered politics for an ideal - freedom from servitude and foreign domination. [/quote]


Bull!!!

Harry entered politics with a clear - set clearer for his muddiheadedness by Ah Choo - view to defrauding this nation and to further his pathetic, vegetable-salting and -preserving stingy, money-pinching Hakka forebears' dream of taking over the Han nation!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Perish the Haks!!!!!!!</description>
			<author>Hakkahunter</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:29:58 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Losing power means death !</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5663</link>
			<description>&quot;N&quot; level students will tell you that old Yew is indirectly trying to upset votes in favor of the alternative parties.

Old Yew is already 84, tell me , how long more he can go on ?

Can you imagine if PAP is deposed by next GE and how would the old man  feel if he is still alive, with DR Chee vetting through the books concerning country's reserves and GIC......??

This is the ACTUAL reason why at his age, he is still coming out like a PM, smearing at alternative parties like no tomorrow.

Please also remember that LKY wishes to die a hero and not a coward. 
He will at all costs try to inflict heavy damage on the alternative parties before the next GE, and before he goes up the hearse.

If all else fails whether he is alive or dead, i strongly believe he must have plans to sabotage sinkapore's finance if PAP is kicked out.
Being a hardcore hypocrite, will die a hypocrite either.</description>
			<author>Low Fuk Yew</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:38:20 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>LKY</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5662</link>
			<description>How credible are you sir, Mr. Lee Kuan Yew? That is the question.</description>
			<author>Tom</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:45:38 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The worst biz to be in</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5660</link>
			<description>To Madam YY Yeong:

I think joining the opposition for the sake of monetary rewards is a really dumb idea.

The risk is just too great. Even greater than say .. a soccer bookie.

So do not blame the readers from thumbing your comments down .. because it is ... not very intelligent.</description>
			<author>elitocracy</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:08:33 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>re: Comment being thumbed down</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5646</link>
			<description>[quote=Madam YY Yeong]Ok, my earlier comment was grayed out because many readers had given me the thumb down for its ratings.

But I was merely stating the fact that opposition is not an unified lot. There are people of different shades of ideology and different degrees of commitment.[/quote]

Your facts comes from PAP's view.</description>
			<author>AnnA</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:33:34 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>re: Comment being thumbed down</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5645</link>
			<description>[quote=Madam YY Yeong]Ok, my earlier comment was grayed out because many readers had given me the thumb down for its ratings.

But I was merely stating the fact that opposition is not an unified lot. There are people of different shades of ideology and different degrees of commitment.[/quote]

Then support those that is in line with your ideology, don't perform a &quot;Walk Over&quot; in your head</description>
			<author>Dicky</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:54:05 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment being thumbed down</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5644</link>
			<description>Ok, my earlier comment was grayed out because many readers had given me the thumb down for its ratings.

But I was merely stating the fact that opposition is not an unified lot. There are people of different shades of ideology and different degrees of commitment.</description>
			<author>Madam YY Yeong</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:35:27 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>That's what the forum is for</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5641</link>
			<description>Guys,

We are know the problem. Let's work towards the solution.

There's a forum on-going now. Put in your best ideas so that we can convince the apathetic majority that oppositions are just as credible.</description>
			<author>elitocracy</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:20:37 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>[No Title]</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5640</link>
			<description>tks for sharing the video..</description>
			<author>tunkudon</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:54:06 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Grantee win</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5639</link>
			<description>Singaporean shall not join politic but the famalee only</description>
			<author>PAPP</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:37:11 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>[No Title]</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5638</link>
			<description>Long Life to the Lee Dynasty!

Thanks to them , we have such a good country!</description>
			<author>Shiyun</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:26:53 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>[No Title]</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5637</link>
			<description>[quote]What is the benefit of having row after row of MPs whose &quot;competence&quot; are measured by whether they graduated with first- or second-class honours, but who care more about what their party boss thinks than about how policies they pass affect the people they say they serve?
[/quote]

Well said.

What is the use of approaching sorry excuse for an MPfor any sort of assistance as most were not even voted in by the people from the many walk over constituencies. 

In fact, LKY have use this GRC concept as a recruitment and training ground for his party - PAP. The are selected, place in wasrds that are sure to win and tested for their political quotient as MPs.

The best part of all this for LKY is that he gets to recruit and test his newly minted PAP cadres/MPs at tax payers money.

Our money!! Paid for PAP organising and administrative expenses. Our money!!</description>
			<author>tohjohn</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:23:33 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>THROW THEM OUT!</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5636</link>
			<description>[color=blue][b]Even PHd holders like Dr Chee, Profs etc etc no matter whom, will be mud slinged by Emperor Lee bec no one is more powerful and greedy than himself!

So face it- he wants the cake all for himself and his gang![/b][/color]</description>
			<author>CAKE ONLY FOR HIMSELF</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:27:23 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>[No Title]</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5635</link>
			<description>Tak Boleh Tahan!!!
PAP MP's are not only got talent but also multi talented.But,how talented they are,merely as a whole they are just PUPPETEERS in the Muppet Show.Only LKY and son at large run the show as director and producer.
Tak Boleh Tahan!!!
For Opposition Brigade's to win the heart and mind of all,in the coming election don't forget to add into their manisfesto that to scrap the cut-throat ERP system.All HDB flats owners to be given freehold status of their property's instead of 99 years lease and promise to abolish the quota system.
It's quite ridicule but possible.
Tak Boleh Tahan!!!</description>
			<author>Tak Boleh Tahan!!!</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:25:45 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>insecure Political PAP!</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5633</link>
			<description>[color=maroon][b]A very very imbalance Political PAP!

A very very insecure Political PAP!

A very very greedy Policitical PAP!

A very very uneducated Political PAP

Should I see a PAP walking towards me and an opposition - I will definitely welcome an opposition![/b][/color]</description>
			<author>uneducated Political PAP</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:28:08 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>FOR PAPA</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5632</link>
			<description>Send all to Prison, Send all to Detention Centre and see if PAP can walk over or not??

Old Man Lee you Bastard you can go to HELL DETENTION CENTRE FIRST FOLLOWED BY YOUR HIGH FLYING MINISTERS!</description>
			<author>HELL DETENTION CENTRE FOR LEES</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:21:39 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NTUC is a joke.</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5631</link>
			<description>Look! S$1.5Mil of subsidies given out to the poor!

http://sg.news.yahoo.com/cna/20080720/tap-553-s-1-5m-worth-food-vouchers-help-231650b.html

Wow, as if NTUC is the poor peoples' grand saviour! This is a big joke.

Singapore has what. 4 million people?

Assuming that these vouchers are for the poorest of the poor, which is probably going to be about 500,000 of the 4 mil population we have on estimate. There would probably be more poor people out there in my opinion.

ok, assuming these 500,000 people live in families of 5.

so its S$1.5mil / 100,000 families = $15 per family.

What the f*** can a family buy for $15 nowadays? Rice? That wouldn't even last a year for a family of 5. I think I'm spending about S$15 a week on my EZLink fares alone, my dear friend.


I hate it when the news puts up news like that, as if $1.5mil is a very great help to the poor. That amount is not even the president's salary for god's sake. On this note, can you imagine how much are those clowns earning?

Blardy stingy assholes we have up there. Afterall, its ALL our Ah Gongs who built Singapore, not ang mohs or your favourite dragon lady from commu land, where most of our jobs are going to now.

Now wake me up if NTUC is going to give a billion out to the poor, if it is ever going to happen. That is real help, and what the poor needs, and they need it now. NOW NOW NOW!</description>
			<author>someone sad</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:21:24 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>HIGH PAY AND HIGH POWER</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5630</link>
			<description>[b]PAP have become power greedy that they have taken the people for granted!

They have taken us voters for granted thinking they will walk over again and again and get the same high pay again and again!

GOOD BYE FOR DREAMING AGAIN AND AGAIN![/b]</description>
			<author>DREAMING AGAIN AND AGAIN</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:19:45 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>[No Title]</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5629</link>
			<description>I couldn't agree with you more Mike Chan, in my heart the Chee siblings are INCREDIBLE HEROES!!!</description>
			<author>Ted</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:18:10 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>KICK THEM ALL OUT</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5628</link>
			<description>[b][/b]Dont have to get so worked up!

Just remember kick them all out!  All 80 of them sitting and talking big out of our monies!

Singing the same old song each and every day in day out!

So sian! Want to puke already!

The same song directed by the Old Man Lee bec paid by the Old Man!

Otherwise you think they want to sing the song!</description>
			<author>SINGING THE SAME OLD SONG</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:16:32 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>[No Title]</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5627</link>
			<description>'National' Day Parade?

But we are going to see yet again only one political party contingent matrching past, not holding the national flag but PAP colours!</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:07:53 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>[No Title]</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5626</link>
			<description>Old Bastard and his yes men talk cork</description>
			<author>Ah Heng</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 07:59:13 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>[No Title]</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5625</link>
			<description>Cool down, people. 
National Day is here.
Time to sing an ALTERNATE NDP song
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HpeTQY_xo0</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 06:41:14 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>re: election system</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5622</link>
			<description>[quote=sideswipe]
we need proportional representation for at least 30% of seats to reduce the effects of gerrymandering and wasted votes.
[/quote]

This is what PAP are afraid of.
No need 30%, one voted strong candidate (Mr JBJ) in parliament LKY cannot tahan already.

To dream of having only 30% is a waste. PAP should not hold as government because they are clearly corrupted!! Corrupted especially in their brains!! GOD DAMN PAP!!</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 03:26:12 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Credibility?</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5620</link>
			<description>PAP the echelon of credibility? Think again.

MM Lee Kuan Yew:
1) Proven hypocrite since 1955 with his speech about democracy which evidently is not present today. 
2) Many of his relatives &quot;just happened&quot; to be heading GLCs due to their &quot;superb rare talents&quot;.
3) Now known officially as not flawless and whatever he said need to be taken with a big pinch of salt, preferably down with NeWater, as his &quot;facts&quot; contain inaccuracy.
4) Only dare to sue in home ground despite his yet another inaccurate claim that he will sue everyone who dare to defame him, latest being his failure to sue IBA for their &quot;libelous&quot; remarks.

PM Lee Hsien Loong:
1) Shamelessly leading his party, PAP, in an election where nearly half the electorate had been denied their voting rights.
2) And even more shamelessly declaring himself having a mandate of 66.6% of the people when only 34.66% of all eligible voters voted for PAP.
3) Now infamous for his speech for &quot;fixing the oppositions&quot; and &quot;Mee Siam Mai Hum&quot;.
4) Wasting tax payers money for failing to take leave from his official duties when he turned up as a witness in a personal defamation suit against Chee Soon Juan.

DPM Wong Kan Seng:
1) Several blunders exposed during 2008 alone. God knows how many more had went unnoticed in past years.
2) Demanding Singaporeans to be held responsible to standards that he himself was incapable of. Perfect example of this being employers of non-limping runaway maids needing to pay penalty after 4 months while Wong Kan Seng himself refuses to take any responsibility after failing to return a limping &quot;alleged&quot; terrorist after more than 5 months to date.

Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam:
1) Shamelessly supporting his own pay increases while condemning pay increases for the rest of the citizens.

&quot;Walkover&quot; MPs:
1) Credible people will never claim that they represent anyone without the person explicitly endorsing it. These walkover MPs were never voted in by anybody but shamelessly proclaim that they represent the citizens in their wards. These are opportunists, not representatives.

(This list is by no mean exhaustive, just something straight off my drowsy brain.)</description>
			<author>Chew</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:52:11 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>re:</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5619</link>
			<description>[quote=Madam YY Yeong]Are you so sure that all involved in the opposition politics are not motivated by money unlike the PAP? 

At least for some people, being an opposition MP with a 14K monthly tax-free MP allowance is a good job prospect, plus a life-long pension after 2 terms in Parliament. No?[/quote]

Harry entered politics for an ideal - freedom from servitude and foreign domination. The British may had tried to break this ideal with the lure of money and promise of powers but they had never succeeded.

If you have told Harry in the 50s that the British has offered him a Swiss bank account + a retirement home somewhere in the Carribean, he would have thrown you out of the door.

Time and tide may have changed the conviction and righteousness of Lee. But that is never the reason to give up our pursue of political correctness.</description>
			<author>greyheyn</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:43:25 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>professionals</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5618</link>
			<description>The example you gave is invalid because these so called professionals are spread around several parties throughtout the ages, which averaged to about very few meaningful statistics of professional people worth their salt in one party

Just talk about SDP - how many of your candidates are of good quality ?  

Tell singaporeans</description>
			<author>Andy</author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:44:38 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>[No Title]</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5617</link>
			<description>Who defines credibility? PAP? SPH? LEt me ask you, LKY, how many of your elitists in the current cabinet truly believe in &quot;Don't ask what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country&quot;? Without the recent pay increase, how many will remind in the cabinet? This is peace time we are talking about now. When Singapore is in turmoil, will they stick with us and not rolling up their fat saving accounts looking for greener pasture. I think PAP has more credibility issue than opposition parties.</description>
			<author>Carslon</author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 22:37:05 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>[No Title]</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5616</link>
			<description>Mdm Yeong should remember that under present circumstances, only potential PAP MPs can be motivated by the MP allowance.

 Candidates for the opposition, on the contrary, risk losing their deposits, even should they escape being sued.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 22:34:56 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>[No Title]</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5615</link>
			<description>Are you so sure that all involved in the opposition politics are not motivated by money unlike the PAP? 

At least for some people, being an opposition MP with a 14K monthly tax-free MP allowance is a good job prospect, plus a life-long pension after 2 terms in Parliament. No?</description>
			<author>Madam YY Yeong</author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 22:21:58 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>[No Title]</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5613</link>
			<description>it's too bad so many people in government are missing a degree in common sense. the funniest thing... this one is free.</description>
			<author>Sinister Minister</author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 22:08:16 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>election system</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5612</link>
			<description>considering 1/3 of eligible voters voted for opps. why is that the opps have only 5% of seats in parliament.
our election system of &quot;single winner district&quot; is a &quot;cruel&quot; method where nothing is given to the losers who get 49% of votes and winner take all with 51%.
we need proportional representation for at least 30% of seats to reduce the effects of gerrymandering and wasted votes.
The opposition have to do better but they are not really rejected by the public as some have said.</description>
			<author>sideswipe</author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:56:43 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>[No Title]</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5611</link>
			<description>PAP MPs talented meh? Most, especially those backbenchers are just...blah.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:18:41 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Hidden Dragon, Crouching Tiger Speech from LKY</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5610</link>
			<description>Is this just another plot from LKY to promote his omniscience-PAP.

History already have had credible oppositions candidates. But his omnipotent have annihilated all!

What rubbish is he talking about!</description>
			<author>V.Benedict</author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:11:23 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>We have many INCREDIBLE Oppo  activistss!</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5609</link>
			<description>Yes, the PAP esp the LKY may think they and only they have monopoly of &quot;credible&quot; leaders.
Let me tell LKY here and now that I believe that in this year 2008, S'pore has many INCREDIBLE Oppo leaders as well as incredible potential activist leaders.Just look at the 18 activists who were charged in court last week by your mata-mata with nothing better to do. Aren't all of them incredible to be so courageous and determined to fight for justice and fairness for the poor and disadvantaged in S'pore? They knew even b4 they joined the TakBolehTahan group in public that they would likely be arrested by LKY's Police and charged in court. Yet they swallowed their fear and bravely pressed ahead...come what may, this is a just cause we are fighting, for the sake of our fellow-citizens, our children, our families  and the future!
We will overcome someday.....just you wait and see!
To me, all of them, esp the Chee siblings are INCREDIBLE HEROES.</description>
			<author>Mike Chan</author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 20:50:47 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Youtube: The Shameless LIAR, The Court of Injustic</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5608</link>
			<description>Watch and hear the drama played by the Shameless LIAR LKY and the Singapore Court of Injustice in Youtube:

Part1: The Shameless LIAR - the &quot;IBA letter&quot; and the IBA Report
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRteulDRrlk


Part 2: The COurt of Injustice
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezgKLrSxkdk

Enjoy!</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 20:37:57 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>SDP all the way.</title>
			<link>http://yoursdp.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=676#josc5605</link>
			<description>&quot;What is disconcerting is that [u]no one dared to tell him to his face[/u] what he really is, an old autocrat in whose mind intellectual decency matters little.&quot;

Excellently written.

Then SDP leaders should go meet that old fart Lee during his MP meet-the-people session and go [u]tell him bluntly at his face[/u] the above that was written by SDP.

We'll all clap and cheer for SDP !</description>
			<author>Man In The Mirror</author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:57:02 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
