Singapore Democrats

A Nation Cheated warned about the S'pore model Print Email
Wednesday, 08 April 2009

Singapore Democrats

The Wall Street Journal recently wrote that Singapore's “export-led economy is falling on its face” with the onset of the global financial crisis. The newspaper added that our economy would be more resilient if it were better balanced and this could be achieved by trimming back GLCs and allowing the domestic private economy to grow.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong admitted as much in an interview where he acknowledged that Singapore might have to rethink its export-led growth strategy.

Way before the problem became dire, Dr Chee Soon Juan had already been warning that Singapore's over-reliance on foreign multinational companies to manufacture goods to be re-exported may not be sustainable.

In Dare To Change published in 1994, he wrote: “Have we become overly reliant on the MNCs and foreign capital?...For the long-term well-being of the economy, Singapore must pay more attention to its private sector." This idea was expanded in his latest publication A Nation Cheated, which continues to sell briskly at Kinokuniya and Select Books. The bookstores have placed yet another order despite the recession.

Perhaps, with the downturn, Singaporeans are waking up to the idea that things may not be quite the way the PAP has been telling them all these years. The excerpt below reveals how backward the PAP Government has been:

The truth of the matter is that Singapore cannot, or does not know how to, break free of its dependence on foreign investment. Analysts Walden Bello and Stephanie Rosenfeld summed up:

'Despite its seeming prosperity, Singapore in 1990 is trapped in the treadmill of the export-oriented economics that it once so enthusiastically embraced. Having so completely open itself up to the world market and the multinationals with the illusion that it could influence the former and manipulate the latter, the PAP technocrats now see that their policies have reduced Singapore's economy to a mere service economy, the fate of which is totally dependent on the calculations and whims of the multi-nationals.'

Singapore's reliance on MNCs has remained deep. The attempts made by the government to "restructure" the economy served only to attract a different category of industries to the country and did little to lessen the economy's dependence on external investments.

Even in 2001, economic analysts still point out that Singapore's problems are caused by its heavy dependence on foreign capital, because "strong competition for FDI [foreign direct investment] has mounted, with cheaper centres in the region already drawing away investments from Singapore."

The convenience of constructing an instant economy fed largely on foreign capital may have served the PAP's interests well. Whether this strategy has helped the welfare of workers, however, remains another matter.

 

 

Share this article:
Facebook Technorati Stumble It! Newsvine Reddit Del.icio.us Digg This!
Comments (8)
  • Tan Tai Wei
    In a tue society of rational people, led by rational politicians, all possible insights, even those allegedly half-buried, like needles in haystacks, amidst purported infantile pranks-like political opposition, would be painstakingly unearthed to be appreciated, especially in our so-claimed "talent-scarce" little red dot.

    Then, rather than busily suing Chee, our millon-dollar paid "leaders" should have been striving to learn from whoever could have contributed.

    Nay, being especially talented, and deserving their pay, they have been duty-bound to put into practice, among other things, their presumed special ability to sniff out even nuggets purportedly mixed with political trash of SDP.

    The above posting seems to show that PAP has missed what Chee could be contributing, and thereby failed at an important responsibility they have been voted, and they have paid themselves, to perform.
  • Robox
    Looks like the thieving PAP has done it again.

    Oh, and dont give credit to Dr Chee for it; instead persecute him and bankrupt him many times over for it.

    I normally don't raise issues, or give ideas that the PAP can steal and go on to win voter approval and parliamentary seats for it.

    But since this topic has come up, I will say my piece.

    Every time there is an economic slowdown or a recession, the blame is placed on other economies. (i.e. lowered demand in Singapore's [b]export[/b] market/s)

    Shouldn't it have been obvious to those charged with fixing the economy (whether in good times or bad) that it is domestic industry and the domestic market for goods and services produced by those industries that need fixing to balance the two?

    Or do those charged with that responsibility believe that fixing reformist politicians makes for legitimate economic activity and higher GDP, and prefer to spend their time and energy on that instead?

    Allow me to alert the SDP that another of your contributions to fixing Singapore's economy, namely Unemployment Insurance (UI) which you have previously raised, is in danger of being ripped off by the PAP.

    The ILO recently commended Canada's version of it, Employment Insurance or EI, for making sound economic sense and for being particularly useful during an economic downturn - I will email a few more details about this to you.

    Having never seen the TBT flyers or other flyers, I may be redundant here. But could your suggestions for the economy be documented on those flyers and become talking points with the voters you approach on your TBT rounds? That way more people will know that these important ideas [b]did not originate with the PAP.[/b]
  • Robox - A couple of additional comments
    1. The truth of the matter is that the PAP and has absolutely no clue on stimulating and running a maturing, and eventually a mature economy. Just as it is with their Third World mentality, they only have a strategy for the economic growth of a an infant economy.

    2. UI should be implemented immediately, and the first receipients of UI should be Dr Chee, Ms Chee, Mr John Tan, and all other Singaporeans who are not able to find employment because of their committment to their political creed. UI payments should also be backdated to the first day of unemployment in each case.

    UI is not a result of PAP largesse; it will come from the public coffers funded by taxpayers.

    At no point did the Singaporean public ever tell the PAP to use policy - stated or otherwise - to persecute our fellow Singaporeans for political differences.

    At the very least, the Singaporean public owes this to the individuals affected by this satanic policy and associated practises.

    Additionally, Article 9(1) of the Constitution states:

    [b]Liberty of the person[/b]
    9. —(1) No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty save in accordance with law.

    I will address the question of the deprivation of life.

    How is it possible to have life if one has been deprived of his/her livelihood?

    Is this deprivation of a livelihood,and therefore life itself in accordance with law? If so, which law? Are those laws based on sound legal principles, and if so, which ones?

    If not, then the individuals affected by the PAP's vindictive and bloodthirsty policy deserve compensation; UI is the very least that Singaporeans owe those individuals for electing the PAP that pursues such a policy.
  • quantum
    http://www.straitstimes.com/print/Breaking%2BNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_361938.html

    April 10, 2009
    Straits Times among 10 brands
    THE Straits Times has been named as one of Singapore's top 10 favourite brands, alongside other household names such as StarHub, NTUC FairPrice and SingTel.

    The list, based on an Internet survey commissioned by independent brand arbiter Superbrands, polled 1,500 consumers here between the ages of 18 and 55.

    The survey - run in January and February and conducted in Singapore, Malaysia and Hong Kong by research firm Nielsen - asked consumers to identify their favourite brands across 93 categories. Brand-name responses were unprompted and more than 500 favourite brands were identified in each economy.

    The result: Toothpaste brand Colgate and Internet search engine Google took the top two spots in Singapore, followed by home-grown cable TV and telecommunications service provider StarHub.

    Local cooperative supermarket chain FairPrice came in fourth. This was followed by telco SingTel in sixth place and The Straits Times in eighth.

    'It is interesting to note the relative positions of brands that compete within the same category such as Google versus Yahoo, and StarHub versus SingTel,' said the chief executive of Superbrands Singapore, Mr Mark Pointer.

    He added: 'The survey was conducted just over a month ago and hence represents a very current finger on the pulse of Singapore consumers and their predisposition towards brands and brand choice.'

    More Singaporeans seem to be opting to go local compared to other nationalities: Here, four local brands clinched top 10 placings. In Hong Kong, however, only two local brands were placed - convenience store chain Circle K and television network TVB. In Malaysia, only bread maker Gardenia made the cut.

    The results do not come as a surprise, said Singapore Polytechnic School of Business lecturer Sarah Lim, who pointed out that the brands in the list enjoy market dominance here.

    'Over time, items like The Straits Times have become a lifestyle product,' she said. 'They are ubiquitous, and the name of these brands is the first thing that comes to mind.'

    Apart from making the top 10 list, two brands - FairPrice and The Straits Times - also dominated their categories by receiving more than double the number of votes from consumers than their next nearest competitor.

    This is the first time the annual survey has been conducted in Singapore.

    'We think the results will help encourage brands and focus people's attention on what consumers are currently thinking about brands,' said Mr Pointer.

    'Given the current economic situation, it is important that companies continue to focus their brands to retain customer loyalty.'
  • jbeji - a self cheated...
    m single,i paid my fair share of good taxes over e years,m not allow to buy HDB directly just bcuz m single,& when m old, i have no welfare..with e misery of thoughts tat again i will not see my CPF..i lost my job & now i hunt outside to find employment,i have no home,just land of residing,m born here yet not my birth right,not my birth place,if yes, why then my voice not heard? i just ask for fairness,a slight degree of giving,my life story untold,no one listen & is often said, take it or leave it so, here i am, feeling cheated of this birthland, m not demanding, just asking a fair share of what i had contributed, m not even asking for welfare BUT just pleading ... dot take more from me anymore, i have nothing else to give except my life and of my life saving in CPF, kindly return me when i needed most, dot attempt anymore of annuity, or funny scheme, juz to take & pay & pay...please, does any soul really care and share, then speak i pray...
  • Robox - To jbeji
    I say this as one SDP/opposition supporter to another: I felt very sad reading your post.

    But I cannot pretend I know exactly how you feel; I would be lying to you.

    I am in a better place now. But I still do care for my fellow Singaporeans who continue to experience the pain that I did.

    I am in a better place now, and that's why I will continue in my fight to help make your life better.

    Just hang in there; our time will come, and it will come before you become old.
  • Foreigner
    Singapore is a very small country that will always be struggling to find its niche. Despite huge falls in GDP, there has been comparatively little impact on people's lives here. Since S'pore employs so many foreigners, they are going to be the ones to bear the brunt of a major recession, not Singaporeans. No doubt things are going to get worse, but the situation elsewhere is much worse than in Singapore. On balance, I think the export-led economy has served S'pore very well over the years. For me the key question at a consumer level is house prices. They are too high in my view, but if they come down, all the home owners are going to feel depressed / poor. I'm glad I don't have to sort out that problem.
  • HaHa Wong - money politics
    The Pay and Pay brigade are only interested in what they can get out of "running" Singapore. They don't care if they are running us to the ground. They spend all their time suing the opposition so that what they are doing (nothing except how to get even more money) remains unmentionable, unquestioned, unchallenged. They who are always right, requires religious faith of the people by the people to always believe everything they do is for our good, while we are getting poorer as they grown rich beyond belief. Give 'em a dose of pork barrel politics before the elections and that will settle it. Call a quickie election, give'em several days to prepare, say their little piece, and we're done with it. What a waste of time, but we need to show the world we are a legitimate democracy, hey we're really stable, there isn't any swing of the pendulum around these parts......guffaw, heehee, nudge nudge. So the old boys' club they call "parliament" continues to make a mockery of Singaporeans.
Please login or register to post your comments.
 

Act Now

Please Donate
More options to donate
 

The SDP National Healthcare Plan

SDP Publictaions

Magazine Support SDP , buy our 30th Anniversary Magazine here


                        pdf link

minsal
pdf
link

 

Danny the Democracy Bear

Now available online here!

 
Banner
Banner

Awesome Words

And that is why I swore never to be silent whenever and whereever human beings endure suffering and humiliation. We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.

Elie Wiesel

News feeds

Singapore Democrat News
Joomla Templates by JoomlaShack