Singapore Democrats

Home News Singapore Singapore may sue Wall Street Journal, Dow Jones
Singapore may sue Wall Street Journal, Dow Jones Print E-mail
Friday, 12 September 2008

The Wall Street Journal

Singapore's attorney general applied to the country's court for contempt proceedings against the company that publishes The Wall Street Journal's Asian edition and two senior editors.

The application relates to two editorials and a letter to the editor that ran in The Wall Street Journal Asia in June and July that the attorney general says "impugned the impartiality, integrity and independence of the Singapore Judiciary."

The first of the editorials, titled "Democracy in Singapore," concerned comments made in a Singapore court as damages were being assessed against Chee Soon Juan, head of the Singapore Democratic Party, and his sister and colleague, Chee Siok Chin. In 2006, the two lost a defamation suit brought by Singapore's Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew and his son, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, over an article the Chees published in their party newsletter that was interpreted by the court to imply corruption on the part of the government.

The application to the court also refers to a letter to the editor written by Mr. Chee and a Journal editorial that cites a report by the International Bar Association's Human Rights Institute on "human rights, democracy and the rule of law" in Singapore.

"We are aware of the statement issued by the Singapore Attorney General's office regarding the application for contempt proceedings against The Wall Street Journal Asia," a Dow Jones spokesman said. "While we are reserving comment on the application until we receive official notification, we do not believe the articles were contemptuous of the Singapore courts."

The Wall Street Journal Asia is owned by Dow Jones & Co., a subsidiary of News Corp. Another Dow Jones publication, The Far Eastern Economic Review, which is banned in Singapore, is defending defamation charges in Singapore brought by the elder Mr. Lee and his son, the prime minister, in relation to an article concerning Mr. Chee.

Singapore's political leaders have previously won damages against several foreign news publications for defamation.

If the application is successful, a hearing date will be set and the respondents will have the opportunity to make their arguments in open court, the attorney general's office said on its Web site.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122115696803124341.html?mod=googlenews_wsj


Singapore seeks contempt proceedings vs Dow Jones
Robert MacMillan
Reuters

Singapore's attorney general is seeking contempt proceedings against the publisher of the Asian edition of the Wall Street Journal and two of its editors, saying their editorials "impugn the impartiality, integrity and independence of the Singapore Judiciary."

The move comes after Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong filed a libel suit against the Far Eastern Economic Review, which like the Journal is owned by News Corp's Dow Jones & Co.

Both cases involve coverage of Singapore's government and opposition Democratic Party leader Chee Soon Juan, and are the latest in a string of legal actions brought by the Southeast Asian country against foreign news organizations.

The attorney general's office said in a statement on its website dated Sept. 11 that two editorials published in the Asian Wall Street Journal titled "Democracy in Singapore" and "Judging Singapore's Judiciary," allege that the judiciary is "not independent" and "is biased and lacks integrity."

The statement also cited a letter to the editor written by Chee called "Produce the Transcript, Show the Truth," that was published in the Asian Wall Street Journal on July 9.

Along with Dow Jones Publishing Co (Asia) Inc, the attorney general named Daniel Hertzberg, international editor at the Asian Wall Street Journal, and Managing Editor Christine Glancey.

"We are aware of the statement issued by the Singapore attorney general's office regarding the application for contempt proceedings against the Asian Wall Street Journal," Journal spokesman Robert Christie wrote in an e-mail.

"While we are reserving comment on the application until we receive official notification, we do not believe the articles were contemptuous of the Singapore courts," he wrote.

The editorial "Democracy in Singapore," published on June 26, concerned comments made in a Singapore court as damages were being assessed against Chee and his sister and colleague, Chee Siok Chin.

In 2006, the two lost a defamation suit brought by Lee and his father, Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew, over an article the Chees published in their party newsletter that was interpreted by the court to imply corruption on the part of the government.

In August, Singapore's prime minister raised the stakes in his libel suit against the Far Eastern Economic Review, saying the magazine implied he was corrupt, court documents showed.

An amendment by Lee's lawyers added the more serious charge to an earlier claim that the magazine had implied that the prime minister was unfit for office because he had condoned corruption by his father.

Singapore leaders have won damages in the past from foreign media groups when they report on local politics, including the Economist, the International Herald Tribune and Bloomberg.

In another contempt case in 1991, Singapore fined the editor of the Asian Wall Street Journal S$4,000 (US$2,777), the proprietors S$4,000 and the publisher S$1,000. The printer and distributor escaped fines but had to pay costs.

At issue was a 1989 story on a Singapore court ruling in favour of then-Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew in his libel action against Derek Davies, then-editor of the Far Eastern Economic Review.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/feedarticle/7791227



Share this article:
Facebook Technorati Stumble It! Newsvine Reddit Del.icio.us Digg This!
Comments (12)
Search RSS
AnnA  -  Sue Back Lah..
Why don't IBA or other human rights group or those 'westeners' sue the Lees back for accusing them for trying "to-do-us-in"??

Why not let them taste their own medicine?
reader  - 
Even though the articles were seemingly accurate to a certain degree. Like Lee said, the government is PAP and PAP is Singapore.

Hence, it's rather unfortunate, tax payers money will be used (again) for Lees egoistical purposes. ;-P
Tan Tai Wei  - 
Lee seems to be caught a trap of his own making.

On the one hand, he had better sue, or by his own purported reasons for suing, if he did not sue, then people would assume that Wall Street Journal articles are right.

One the other hand, when he does sue, and wins, it would only confirm yet again, in the minds of the already suspicious, that the judiciary is not independent.

Not very clever, politically. Or, 'you reap what you sow', or, from the viewpoint of 'Asian values', it is the law of karma.
anon  -  win somewhere else
If he can win the law suit in a first world country ... I will quit winning this website.
Chew  -  Sue where?
So who is to judge this libel suit that allegedly "impugn the impartiality, integrity and independence of the Singapore Judiciary."?

The Singapore Judiciary? That'd be a conflict of interest.
AnnA  -  Foreign Country
The IBA or others can sue the Lees in London.

If the Lees are able to call them in, I am sure others can call them out too.

Lees must get people who have this principle in life - "If you can, I can"
Anonymous  - 
This is a farse! The Judiciary should just sue LBA instead as it wasn't the WSJ who produced that damning report....but i guess they knew very well that they are not going to get very far with sueing the LBA. Well, if you can't beat the big man, punch up his little brothers instead!
Anon  - 
What's wrong with those editorials?! Contempt of the courts?????????
ahsayman  - 
Look who is causing Singapore harm now?
Sue foreigners here, victory is almost certain. But to become a laughing stock behind their smiles of diplomacy? How much more must be spent to buy respect with the people's money. It's really a bottomless pit in one way and a limited depth in another. The reader decides which is which.
Uncle Ver SG  -  Nice analysis
On the one hand, he had better sue, or by his own purported reasons for suing, if he did not sue, then people would assume that Wall Street Journal articles are right.

One the other hand, when he does sue, and wins, it would only confirm yet again, in the minds of the already suspicious, that the judiciary is not independent.

Is pissing off Rupert Murdoch a good move? Expect a media war in the State Times and an unflattering "profile" of Mr Murdoch in days to come.

And the race/colonist card (despite Murdoch being an Aussie).
ah beng  -  everytime sue, got nothin better to do.
This LKY will one day do S'pore's reputation in. I'm starting to be ashamed of being S'porean.
Carlson  - 
Wonder if he will sue Saint Peter if he does not got to go to heaven.
Please login or register to post your comments.
 

Announcements

An Evening of Dazzle with The Democrats

Event: SDP's 30th anniversary gala dinner
Date:
27 Feb 2010 (Saturday)
More information here

 

Let's Talk

SDP's Let's Talk with Ng Yi-Sheng
by SingaporeDemocrats

You need a Flash Player enabled browser to view this YouTube video
youtube link
Share this article:
Facebook Technorati Stumble It! Newsvine Reddit Del.icio.us Digg This!
 

Awesome Words

I cannot and will not recant anything, for to go against conscience is neither right nor safe.

Martin Luther

Other languages

Banner
Banner
Banner

Act Now

More options
 
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
 

News feeds

Singapore Democrat News
Joomla Templates by JoomlaShack