Singapore Democrats

Awesome Words

He who rejects change is the architect of decay. The only human institution which rejects progress is the cemetery.

Harold Wilson

Your SDP Forum

forum-sepia.jpg
Join the online policy discussion II
1. The Economic System
2. Social Security and the CPF
3. Healthcare
4. Kopitiam
 

Tak boleh tahan!

dancing-ministers.jpg
 

Singapore's #1 political website

no1_website.png
 

Friends of SDP

 
Banner
Banner
Banner
Home News Singapore F1 and our future
F1 and our future PDF Print E-mail
Wednesday, 08 October 2008

Singapore Democrats

As the souped-up engines roared and the fancy cars burned rubber on our roads, one in four Singaporeans turned up to watch the racing spectacle, making it a sport with real mass appeal.

Yes, that's what happened in 1966 when the Singapore Grand Prix was held at its permanent Upper Thomson circuit. Half-a-million people from a population of close to 2 million thronged the area to witness and enjoy the event in a carnival-like atmosphere. With food and drink in hand, Singaporeans young and old converged on the grassy knolls and whatever space they could find to catch the action that included the vintage and saloon car categories.

Contrast this with the recent F1 race held downtown. Reportedly 100,000 attended the race – half of them tourists. One wonders how many of the remainder are millionaire residents and expatriates. With tickets ranging from a few hundred to several thousand dollars, you can be sure few were locals.

Hotel accommodation around the circuit went for as much as $1,000 for standard rooms with the Government apparently demanding one-third of the revenue. Luxury yachts were available for rent for as much as a million dollars so that tycoons could entertain their guests.

What about the locals? Too bad -- no money, no talk.

The then-and-now of motor-racing is symptomatic of society in Singapore which has become the playground for the rich. There's really nothing wrong with this except that locals serve only as props and backstage hands to put up this grand show so that the PAP can bask in the accolades showered by the foreigners.

In fact, the commercial gain of the race to the average Singaporean was questionable. Businesses in the cordoned-off area were badly hit. Motorists couldn't get around the city area without having to take detours because of the road closures.

What about the jobs created from the race? As with much of everything else, foreign workers were available in abundance to ensure that no crumb that fell off the organiser's and Government's table was left behind.

The casinos are another example. Built by the foreign poor to cater to the foreign rich, Singaporeans are just bystanders cued to ooh and aah at the right moments when the Integrated Resorts are unveiled.

Easy money. That's what the F1 and casinos really represent. They are there for one purpose and one purpose only: To continue attracting the super-rich to this island by bringing in entertainment only they can afford. This way, the PAP can tell us how wealthy we are even as we see our real incomes shrink and retirement savings evaporate.

This is not the kind of economy built on enterprise and diligence. We know we can't compete on the innovation front with a system that is determined to wring the creative life out of every resident here. So we resort to creating an island where dirty money, vice and thrills for the rich can call home. The PAP calls it "vision".

The question that Singaporeans had better be asking is: Is our country headed in the right direction? Is making money, however we do it, the be-all and end-all of this country? With the economic crisis looming ahead are we prepared for the knocks when we've placed ourselves in the hands of so-called financial movers and shakers?

Even as we build this playground that we call Singapore, we had better start thinking of the shelter we will be needing pretty soon.



Comments
Add New Search RSS
Bernard Chan  -  Spot on AGAIN    Thu, 09 Oct 2008 7:23 am
SDP, you guys are spot ON again. You tend to see what the normal Singaporeans can't perceive; even if we are able to notice it but we are not able to write it so vividly.

Thank you SDP.
HK  -  the Elites pay are based on growth    Thu, 09 Oct 2008 8:11 am
Dear All

Everything has a starting point.

In Spore, the elites : Ministers, Civil Servants are all paid ridiculous salaries simply because they can!

Who to stop them? That rubber stamp otherwise known as Parliament (Toilet)?
Where laws are changed for the elites' benefit.

They say they are talented and needs to be paid super high. The country's Treasury (run by the same greedy bunch) simply pay.

Have you ever wondered why their ex-Minsisters or ex-Top Civil servants cannot get employed by private organizations?

Why do they allow so many poor uneducated foreigners to work in Spore? So that they economy can grow and the Elite can get their pay rise.

It is that simple.

It does not matter that locals cannot find jobs simply because the foreigners can work with 2 days off a month; and 12 or 14 hours per day. A local cannot work on such condition as the employer will be hauled to court. This is a ridiculous situation.

But all for growth. For that increase in salary that is justified by economic growth.

Now you see the elites rape the country of Singapore; disadvantaged the Citizens especially the poor out of their jobs; and through their controlled newsprint which they proudly call newspapers, trumpet their success to the world.

This is a Country pillaged, ravaged & incestuously tainted by that single Family & their cronies. Even the Political Party is a cover for the Family to extend the reach of their greedy hands.

Shameless Family.

May they be cursed for 20 generations with strokes, cancer & still born.

I am really angry and I apologise for being so hateful.
Mike  -  I disagree    Thu, 09 Oct 2008 8:16 am
F1 has shown how beautiful Singapore. There may other indirect benefits. Do not be too quick to jump into conclusion.
Eeeediot  -  First World Facade?    Thu, 09 Oct 2008 9:37 am
Hmm...yeah I mean holding the F1 just causes inconvenience to the lives of other people and road-users. Don't really care whether it's the FIRST ever night-race or what...

Did it really earn revenue for our people or for the organisers (read: Sinkee Inc.)?

Also, while we are at it, let me just add in/bring back the Olympic medal thingy... Taxpayer's money used for buying back a Silver medal...and then what? Suppose to feel proud of that? I feel prouder for our Paralympians and Mr Tan Howe Liang than these money-grubbers A.K.A China B-Team (... And boy am I glad the Torch didn't have to come by this way.

Also, is holding the FIRST-ever Youth Olympics suppose to help us in any way? More revenue for Sinkee Inc.? Wayang much? Chance to let our young sportsman to shine? You want to let our young sportsmane shine, very easy. Just expose them to the real Olympics instead of using 'mercenaries'.

Also, will the Casino be another place of illegal activities (e.g a la NKF) despite having rules and security measures? You never know =


Your thoughts, people?
AnnA  -  Recession    Thu, 09 Oct 2008 9:57 am
I saw the news today on Yahoo news page. Says that US is in recession and so does Singapore. Will be official by this Friday (if I'm not wrong).

Thanx to someone's ugly wife and daughter-in-law.

One good news though, time for those citizens who couldn't buy flat to start looking for one.

Sorry guys, I think its fair enough to give the commoners a break. God is Great, yeah? Think positive. We will not be affected too much because we have been facing our own 'recession' for quite sometime already... The grandmothers and grandfathers already practice since 5 years ago...

One more wish... May the land that is building the casinos collapse :P
Ng E-Jay  -  Good article     Thu, 09 Oct 2008 10:32 am
A concise and hard-hitting take on the F1 event. Stripped of the veneer of all the propaganda surrounding it, the F1 event is clearly just a plaything for the rich and well-connected, with questionable benefit to the resident population who had their small businesses affected and who had difficulties commuting during the event.

The comparison with 1966 SG Grand Prix is also very good, and serves to illustrate how locals are increasingly being alienated in their own country in the name of globalization. "Built by the foreign poor for the foreign rich" indeed.

Surely there has to be more enduring ways for the nation to earn money and create jobs for its citizens.

Are these elitist sideshows all that we can do to attract wealth and boost our economy?

Or are these more down-to-earth but harder-to-implement solutions, like giving Singaporeans a well-rounded education, exposing them to ideas from all around the world without the usual paranoia from the PAP.
snabsnab  -  Excellent Article    Thu, 09 Oct 2008 3:34 pm
Well done SDP...excellent article and observation...hope you'll win more votes and support! Cheers!
Observer  -  Sandwiched Singaporean    Thu, 09 Oct 2008 3:46 pm
"I know that many Singaporeans who are not so poor but also not so well off feel that they are pressured. Middle-income Singaporeans and they feel that they’re the sandwiched class, stuck in the middle. But when you ask who is the sandwiched class, all the way from quite low down to quite high up, it’s a very fat sandwich..." - PM Lee

We can make an assumption that soon it will be rich foreign talent, top of the sandwich. Poor foreigner worker bottom of the sandwich. Singaporean all stuck in between, dependent on government support, while letting the rich and famous enjoy our country.

If one look far enough, one day it might be that Singapore might become a place whereby only the super rich can make it while the majority of people, the singaporean are just there to serve them. Income discrepency will be wider with the rich getting richer and the average Singapore remaining as where they were. Different classes of people might develope in Singapore when we make our country into a playground for the rich and famous.

Will this country developed into a place meant to be a home for Singaporean to enjoy and live in or will it become a place served only for the sole purpose of economic growth and money making for the elite.
as simple as abc  -  simple fact - get real    Thu, 09 Oct 2008 4:38 pm
ONLY FOR PAPEES TO STAY TO COLLECT MONIES TO STAY IN POWER LAH!

JUST THROW THEM ALL OUT!
Husrin  -  Thumbs up.    Thu, 09 Oct 2008 4:47 pm
I love all of you guys here. (Except Mike)




You represent the smartest and, most intelligent portion of the Singapore population.



It's what keeps me going day by day.




Go you guys! Go SDP!


(:
abc  -  F1 is good for Singapore    Thu, 09 Oct 2008 5:00 pm
F1 is one of the most popular sports. Singapore has put herself on the world map. This will indirectly help the economy, I think.

I personally support F1 in Singapore. It is just a pity that we don't have the foresight to be the first to do it in Southeast Asia.
Daniel Ling  -  re: I disagree and agree (Neutrally)    Thu, 09 Oct 2008 5:30 pm
Mike wrote:
F1 has shown how beautiful Singapore. There may other indirect benefits. Do not be too quick to jump into conclusion.


For a rare once, I actually agree with Mike.

There are indeed indirect benefits
- Hotels making money
** Yes but the profit is still taken by the Owner (Aka Elite/Rich)
- Branded Retails making money (Read the cashier count cash till cannot take it)
** Same as the above
- Cheap Labour (Those tat carry this carry tat) gets a job for this period
** It's only for a few days, after the event, it will still be jobless cheap labour.

So does this benefit us?

At the same time i can also think of direct NON Benefits
- I can't go Suntec to eat wat i wan
- I can't go tat area to ride my bike
- I wan see free show cannot
- A Place in the Central of SG, tat has been set up over time, through blood and tears, etc. With $ tat we can safety say we Citizens share in (Tax, etc) BUT WE R BEING BARRED FROM GOING IN? Although it's fair to say tat nothing is free and this is a "High Class" show, but shouldn't citizens have benefits? Cheaper tix, etc?

Anyway, just for the note, i'm not interested watsoever in this F1. But i am interested in food at Suntec. So yea, it disadvantaged me. DIRECTLY.
John Richards  -  F1 - what's government's revenue?    Thu, 09 Oct 2008 5:42 pm
"Hotel accommodation around the circuit went for as much as $1,000 for standard rooms with the Government apparently demanding one-third of the revenue."

I don't understand why the government should gain anything from hotel revenues other than the usual GST etc.

I understand that they wanted the Cricket Club to make payments too and threatened to raise some kind of barrier to obstruct club members' view of the race. In the end, some kind of compromise was reached.Perhaps one of you out there might know what really happened.

I mean, you hold a race in my frontyard, why should I have to pay to watch?

Greed knows no bounds.
angry_one  -     Thu, 09 Oct 2008 5:43 pm
The problem with sinkeeland holding an event like F1 or the youth Olympics is, this is just an island, and the event will technically cripple the whole country in terms of transport and infrastructure.

It's not like some foreign country with a great mass of land, where if you build a casino is one city and the city is ruined, the country still stands, and disgruntled residents can move out. Here, you're finished and have nowhere to go.

40+ years on, and this pathetic island has not thought of a value-add economy that creates things to make money. It still depends on trends, foreign patronage and money laundering to make itself.
B  -     Thu, 09 Oct 2008 6:26 pm
Call a spade a spade. It is not a integrated resort. It is an integrated casino or a casino plain and simple. I have never heard all the casinoes along the Las Vegas strip called intergrated resorts. Vegas was not built on being a big resort, but on profits from gambling.
Write comment
Name:
Email:
Website:
Title:
UBBCode:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 

Donate to Legal Defence Fund

 

Vantage

Riding out the financial crisis

Chia Ti Lik

Year 2008 is a year of change, of forced consolidation and rebirth.

Out of university in 1998, I entered the workforce in 1999 fresh with memories of having to work part-time throughout my practice law course. The economy was still feeling the effects of the Asian financial crisis.

Read more
 
The quicksand of Sands

Singapore Democrats

Just weeks after the Singapore authorities gave an upbeat report that the Integrated Resort Casino will create thousands of jobs, developer Las Vegas Sands (or as some wit cracked, Lost Wages Sands) reported that it is haemorrhaging cash and will likely file for bankruptcy.

Read more
 

People's Power

Banner
Banner
Joomla Templates by JoomlaShack