Singapore Democrats

Home News Singapore The latest Hooray
The latest Hooray Print E-mail
Friday, 19 December 2008

Singapore Democrats

A candlelight vigil was held on the night of 17 Dec 08, the last night of Mr Isrizal's and Mr Shafi'ie's prison sentence.

More than 30 friends, family, activists and supporters came to the vigil which stretched through the night as they awaited the release of the two men. Mr John Tan started serving his sentence on 16 Dec and will be released on 30 Dec 08.

Candles were lit and lined the kerb facing the main gates of the Queenstown Remand Prison. By midnight, there were just five who were able to stay through the night. But they were not alone as messages of support and pledges of solidarity had been penned on a large placard. SMSes of the same spirit were received throughout the night.

A vigil is a kind of purposeful sleeplessness – the Latin root, vigilia, denotes "watch, watchfulness, wakefulness". Traditionally used in an ecclesiastical sense to describe a devotional exercise performed on the eve of a festival or holy day, in this instance it was a night to devote attention to our three prisoners of conscience.

Famously dubbed as the "kangaroo t-shirt trio", the contempt of court charges were brought against them by the Attorney-General who insisted that he took action in his capacity as the "Guardian of the Public Interest".

As a public interest issue, the question remains if this was the best course of action to take against three citizens for wearing t-shirts which bore an image with no words.

The night was cool and the air still. Sound carried from the guardhouse behind the gates. At one point, late into the night, the guard could be heard reporting on the vigil: "One was 'doing arts-&-craft', the others chatting whilst another was 'looking at the stars', etc." The arts-&-craft activity was in reference to the making of a "Welcome Back" sign.

A song* (see below) was written and rehearsed, sung tongue-in-cheek to the tune of Amazing Grace, to greet the two.


Morning came and supporters and well-wishers arrived to greet the two as the time of release neared.

At around 10 am, Mr Shafi'ie emerged. He strode to the gates, calm, composed and dignified. He was garlanded and warmly hugged. He was also presented with a booklet, a compilation of articles about his valour and strength in the face of such difficulty, especially at such a young age. The song was performed with gusto and to much laughter.

Mr Isrizal appeared soon after (at about 10.30 am). Upon exiting the prison, he punched the air shouting "Merdeka!" The same welcome was extended and he was also garlanded, hugged and "serenaded".


See more photos here

Watch video here
(Shafi'ie) and here (Isrizal)


A letter by Jufrie Mahmood

Hi little brother,

Our paths crossed not very long ago. But the more I get to know you the more respect I have for you. Your quiet ways seem to betray the strength that is within you.

I suppose even the judge failed to judge your character correctly when he asked you to tender your apologies. He forgot the adage of not judging a book by its cover. If only we had more youngsters like you and brother Isrizal the battle would have been won long ago.

This Thursday morning I watched you marching out of Queenstown Prison and as I garlanded and hugged you I could feel your heartbeat. It somehow tells me that you are none the worse for the experience.

Surely Singapore has not heard the last of this young patriot, I told myself. As for those who think that this young man had been misled into "committing a crime" it would do them well to think again and be honest with themselves. How could a man with such a strong conviction to put things right ever be misled into doing something against his will?

Some, perhaps even members of your own family, may think that you are being ridiculous. But to many others you are simply extraordinary. Someday, I am sure, they will come round to see your point.

I read the piece written by Chih Mei. Like her I too have three young children. They may or may not trek the path which their father has taken. But I make it a point to engage and guide them to do the right things. They may or may not go astray in this materialistic world, but God willing they will ultimately choose the right path. And never be swayed by PAP propaganda.

In Isrizal I could see another man with a conviction that is equally strong. I could sense it as I watched him taking his stride from the prison gates. He knows exactly what he wants to do and where he is heading.

Together with our brothers in the SDP we can play a role that even the Malay MPs and so called religious leaders shy away from, ie to stand up for our rights within the context of a multi-racial setting.

I cannot help feeling that his short "vacation" with you in Queenstown has made him much stronger and better prepared for the long journey ahead. We will not be making this journey all on our own.

Many people I have been speaking to appear to be waiting to be led. Many issues need to be addressed and solutions found. Let's put our shoulders to the wheel and steer it towards the right direction.

Very best regards,
Jufrie

 

*Song lyrics

Oh Shafi'ie and Isrizal,
For seven days, you were jailed
Because of _ _ _ and _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (**)
And a single kangaroo

And now you're back with us today
We hope you enjoyed your stay
But John's still inside this afternoon
And the rest will join in, soon

Hip Hop Hooray
Hip Hop Hooray
Hip Hop Hooray Hooray

Hip Hop Hooray
Hip Hop Hooray
Hip Hop Hooray today

**Play hangman. Fill in the blanks at your own peril.

 

Share this article:
Facebook Technorati Stumble It! Newsvine Reddit Del.icio.us Digg This!
Comments (3)
  • g_e - Tell it like it is, dude.
    [i]" the contempt of court charges were brought against them by the Attorney-General who insisted that he took action in his capacity as the "Guardian of the Public Interest".[/i]

    Shurely shome mishtake, SDP? Don't you mean the "Guardian of the PAPPY's Interest"????
  • tan
    Live to fight another day.
  • Singapore1
    Friday, December 19, 2008
    Dr Michael D Barr: "Singapore is at heart a corrupt dictatorship"
    Ladies and Gentlemen,

    Another confirmation of what everyone is saying. Which is, Singapore is Lee Kuan Yew's dictatorship which he manages principally through a corrupt and compliant judiciary. Can we expect another round of defamation and contempt of courts lawsuits, or is it only in cases where the victim is helpless? That is, if he is within Singapore?

    Dr. Barr has done a great service to the people of Singapore. Thank you. And so has Mr. Francis Seow for writing the book. Thank you.

    Gopalan Nair 39737
    Paseo Padre Parkway, Suite A1
    Fremont, CA 94538, USA
    Tel: 510 657 6107
    Fax: 510 657 6914
    Email: nair.gopalan@yahoo.com
    Blog: http://singaporedissident.blogspot.com/

    Your letters are welcome. We reserve the right to publish your letters. Please Email your letters to nair.gopalan@yahoo.com And if you like what I write, please tell your friends. You will be helping democracy by distributing this widely. This blog not only gives information, it dispels government propaganda put out by this dictatorial regime.

    Beyond Suspicion? The Singapore Judiciary
    Pacific AffairsFall 2008: Vol 81, Number 3
    ProQuest Asian Business and Reference pg. 494
    Review by Dr Michael D Barr
    Flinders University, Australia

    BEYOND SUSPICION?

    The Singapore Judiciary By Francis T. Seow; with a foreword by Gary Woodard. New Haven (Connecticut) : Yale University Southeast Asia Studies, 2006. xxii, 405pp. (Tables.)
    US$26.00 paper. ISBN 0-938692-87- 9.

    Order from Amazon

    FRANCIS Seow's third book is a savage and unmerciful critique of Singapore's judicial system. He provides convincing evidence that the Singapore court system is basically the play-thing of former Prime Minister (currently Minister Mentor) Lee Kuan Yew, through which he toys with and destroys his enemies at his leisure; corrupting the Bench, the legal profession, the police and the profession of journalism on the way through. The case presented by Seow – which is overwhelming drawn from the intimate detail of a single legal battle – demonstrates beyond reasonable doubt that Singapore is at heart a corrupt dictatorship separated from Third World dictatorships primarily by its national income and the cleverness of the techniques by which it manipulates institutional power.

    It is a damning indictment that could have been much more powerful if Seow had resisted the temptation to indulge in childish name calling and heavy-handed didacticism. These acts of self-indulgence dominate the first part of the book and are never far away in the rest. Their main impact, as far as I can see, is to give defenders of the Singapore system and of Lee Kuan Yew the excuse they need to dismiss the book as 'just another anti-Singapore rant'. Seow's arrogant style was probably perfected while he was part of the system he is now critiquing (having been Lee's choice for the position of Solicitor-General in the 1980s), but if the reader can put these defects aside it will become clear that this is a deeply disturbing story of manipulative and duplicitous behaviour on the part of Lee Kuan Yew as he set out to use a quiescent judicial and legal fraternity to destroy an innocent man, along with his wife and his lawyer.

    The man in question is Tang Liang Hong who had the temerity to question the procedure by which Lee Kuan Yew and other notables (including his son and the current prime minister, Lee Hsien Loong), were cleared of any suggestion of impropriety when they accepted million dollar discounts from a property developer. Much of the book is concerned with the political and public relations machinations by which Tang was caught up in Lee's web of retaliation, but in this review it must be sufficient to relay just a few of the most salient facts to give the reader a sense of the book.

    For instance, what are we to make of a legal system that gives a defendant a couple of hours (literally) to find a solicitor, a translator (since she could speak no English), and prepare and present a defence in court to a procedure about which she had literally no understanding? Or where a judge sits in judgement on a case where he himself is implicated as a recipient of one of the real estate discounts that started the whole procedure, and who had previously worked for the family law firm of the primary litigant (Lee Kuan Yew)? Or where a judge (not the same judge) can receive many sets of documents, each hundreds of pages thick and so badly copied and paginated as to substantially illegible and unreadable, and yet two and a half hours later bring down a legal judgement based on his considered legal interpretation of the implications of their contents? Or where a summons to chambers is issued by an appellant's lawyers rather than by the court, but the court upholds it? Or where evidence that proves beyond all reasonable doubt the innocence of the defendant is not only refused admission in court, but all record of its existence is expunged from the record?

    Seow has drawn primarily on court documents for his evidence, having been supplied with a complete set (included documents later expunged from the record) by Tang Liang Hong, who is now a de facto exile from Singapore. Fully the last third of the volume is occupied by transcriptions of some of the most damning court documents, including a fair sample of documents where Lee Kuan Yew and his allies condemn themselves by their own words. (Seow delights in using Lee's own words to demonstrate his capriciousness and duplicity. At one point he was even able to cite Lee as his primary source to sustain his charge that Lee was the arch-manipulator of the proceedings. Seow tends to overplay his hand when using this technique, but Lee's arrogance and peremptory choice of words do rather lend themselves to ridicule.)
    This is a powerful book, but it could have been much more.

    Dr Barr :Lecturer in International Relations, School of Political and International Studies, Flinders University School Director of Studies (B.A) School Ethics Research Adviser Deputy Chair, Faculty of Social Sciences Undergraduate Standing Committee.
    Home
    Posted by Gopalan Nair at 5:44 PM 0 comments
Please login or register to post your comments.
 
Singapore Democrats on Facebook
Banner

Act Now

Support Democracy!
Please Donate
The party that stands up for you

More options to donate

 

Ads

Magazine Support SDP , buy our 30th Anniversary Magazine here

Awesome Words

Collective fear stimulates herd instinct, and tends to produce ferocity toward those who are not regarded as members of the herd.

Bertrand Russell

Other languages

Banner
Banner
Banner


 
Banner
Banner
Banner
 

News feeds

Singapore Democrat News
Joomla Templates by JoomlaShack