Singapore Democrats

Home News Singapore Singaporeans can kiss elections goodbye
Singaporeans can kiss elections goodbye Print E-mail
Monday, 13 April 2009

Singapore Democrats

The SDP has been hoping that it will not come to pass. But it has. Singapore is set to purchase electronic voting machines from India. (See here). We might as well kiss elections goodbye. This is no melodrama and it is certainly no exaggeration. Here's why:

Years ago, the PAP Government was already toying with the idea of using Direct Recording Electronic (DRE) machines. In a nutshell, these are machines that require voters to cast their ballots through touch-screen or push-button technology. The vote is then electronically recorded and tallied.

We don't have to spell it out for you how such a process is open to electronic tampering and rigging.

A New York Times editorial in October 2008 noted: "In the early days of electronic voting, critics who warned that it was unreliable were dismissed as alarmist. Now it seems that hardly an election goes by without reports of serious vulnerabilities or malfunctions."

CIA electronics expert Mr Steven Stigall warned that "wherever the vote becomes an electron and touches a computer, that's an opportunity for a malicious actor potentially to...make bad things happen."

World renowned computer security and voting specialist, Dr Rebecca Mercuri, writes: "It is my strong recommendation that all election officials REFRAIN from procuring ANY system that does not provide an indisputable, voter verified paper ballot." (emphasis hers)

And all these are warnings in, and to, a democratic system like the US. Imagine the situation in Singapore.

In the days and weeks ahead, this website will publish more analysis of DRE systems and how vulnerable they are to manipulation. Only an idiot will believe that such systems can be made tamper-proof. And yes, we are talking about stand-alone machines, not Internet systems susceptible to hackers. 

We will also analyse more about the PAP's proposed system for Singapore and draw attention to ways that the election system is further endangered.

The Singapore Democrats will make this prediction: When the machines are first introduced, the opposition will make electoral gains. A couple of constituencies may fall to the opposition. The electorate will be encouraged that the electronic voting system is trustworthy. The media will make sure of this. (What better to convince the people than by letting the opposition win a couple more seats?)

When the people have been sufficiently disarmed and the sugar-coated poison has been completely swallowed, the PAP will never have to worry about elections again. Ever.

Already, questions about the present system abound. Even without electronic voting, the system is already stacked against the opposition: No independent election commission, no free media, initimidating voters through HDB upgrading, buying votes through shares, introducing the GRC system, and so on.

With the advent of the computer voting machines, we can forget about debates over issues like gerrymandering or the GRC system or the granting of citizenship to immigrants as tactics the PAP uses to win elections.

None of these will matter anymore.

 

Share this article:
Facebook Technorati Stumble It! Newsvine Reddit Del.icio.us Digg This!
Comments (14)
  • Robox
    With electronic voting, I don't see any possibility of a bank of spoilt votes; I can only imagine that you do have to make a choice because of the discrete nature of computer programming.

    Another piece of information that I would be interested in is whether your vote will be linked to your identity, such as with the serial number on the paper slip.
  • Blur
    My concern is that this will lead to
    more migration by those who are able
    to do so. There will be a loss of
    talent.
  • TokMatSalleh - Sad
    Ini orang PAP cowards!
  • maxchew - Desperate to survive and survive well!
    Not actually cowards....they are desperadoes and desperate people do desperate things to SURVIVE!
    It's all or nothing for the PAP "elites" here. Either they have massive wealth and power here or they have to flee......
  • vincesdp
    Funny programming scenario of polling machines:


    if(Opposition vote > PAP vote)
    {
    Opposition vote = 0;
    }

    There is no need to vote any more. You cannot win this programming formula.
  • Kai Xiong - re:
    [quote=Robox]With electronic voting, I don't see any possibility of a bank of spoilt votes; I can only imagine that you do have to make a choice because of the discrete nature of computer programming.[/quote]

    Only if the computer records your votes faithfully. But would you rather have spoilt votes or vote tampering?

    The possibility of foul play is extraordinarily high for little gain.

    [quote]Another piece of information that I would be interested in is whether your vote will be linked to your identity, such as with the serial number on the paper slip.[/quote]

    The order of votes cast is known to the computer and this bit of information can be recorded and further correlated with either the order in which voters register themselves at the polling centre, or a security camera video recording of voter movements. Of course, we take it that the machines are not like ATMs, with their own little cameras.
  • Kai Xiong - re:
    [quote=vincesdp]There is no need to vote any more. You cannot win this programming formula.[/quote]

    That's too blatant. Slightly more crafty:

    IF GRC must not be lost THEN
    IF Opp votes > PAP votes THEN
    PAP votes = (total votes - (margin + x)) / 2
    Opp votes = total votes - PAP votes
    END IF
    END IF

    WHERE

    1. 'margin' is the minimum difference in votes required to conduct a paper ballot audit

    2. 'x' is a random positive integer to make the vote difference more random and the final vote counts appear realistic
  • tewniaseng
    Nia Mah !!! like this better abolish election, let them rule 1000 years.
  • AnnA - How to trust?
    If opposition wins, PAP might blame it on the machine's fault.

    And if PAP wins, the machine might being system that way. How to trust the programmer?

    I hope those programmers sabotage PAP :)

    But hey... even ezlink new card is very faulty.. they still want to use electronic gadgets for elections? PAP is super morons!! That's why...
  • Robox - To Kai Xiong
    I found another write up on this topic:

    http://www.sammyboy.com/showthread.php?t=24468

    The two statements from the article that seem to answer my queries are:

    1. "The electronic voting machines are becoming popular because they eliminate the possibility of invalid and doubtful votes..."

    and;

    2. "We have customised the machines to meet the electoral requirements of these countries."

    As for the second of the two statements, the 'electoral requirements' are to keep a large section of the population fearful that their vote is not a secret, and thereby siphon off votes to the PAP.

    I have never come across any justification by the PAP about the purpose that serial numbers on the voting slip serve.

    This brings me back to my first question: I understand that there are some people who have the fear I speak about, want to vote for the opposition, but compromise by spoiling their vote instead.

    With electronic voting, this is not possible.

    Perhaps these people should now just stay away from the polls on polling day; it draws votes away from the PAP and those votes would not have gone to the opposition anyway.

    Perhaps others feeling that way should be encouraged to do the same, not by any political party though because the law states that voting is compulsory.
  • tewniaseng
    For me I am not worried that the govt knows I vote for opposition. In fact I want them to know to show our displea sure,their fail policy,etc....
  • LIM TUNG HEE - "Fixing" Election Machine?
    The Opposition should invite programming experts to help scrutinise the functions of such machine as to check whether they could be tampered or are just tabulation gadgets.

    If programmable,then these machines are very much like gaming machines where the odds can be fixed.

    It is much the same reason why people who play slot-machines always end up losing to the casinos.

    If installed,the Elections or rather the Opposition will be "fixed" without a doubt.
  • singexpat53 - humans decide not machinecome
    come on guys, wake up its not machines that puts govt in power but people. So, wake up singaporeans, open your eyes and vote with your conscience and not your fear cos thats when they will win.
  • singexpat53 - re: humans decide not machines
    could someone explain why the original text been edited. Its ironic that my opinion and views have been curtailed by someone who is either not committed to the cause of freedom and free speech but or just paying lip service to the fight for democracy.
Please login or register to post your comments.
 

Latest Videos

Dr Chee Soon Juan's address at SDP's 30th Anniversary Dinner
by SingaporeDemocrats

You need a Flash Player enabled browser to view this YouTube video
youtube link
Share this article:
Facebook Technorati Stumble It! Newsvine Reddit Del.icio.us Digg This!
 
SDP's 30th Anniversary Dinner
by SingaporeDemocrats

You need a Flash Player enabled browser to view this YouTube video
youtube link
Share this article:
Facebook Technorati Stumble It! Newsvine Reddit Del.icio.us Digg This!
 

Other languages

Banner
Banner
Banner


 

Awesome Words

Let us have faith that right makes might; and in that faith let us to the end dare to do our duty as we understand it.

Abraham Lincoln

Act Now

More options
 
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
 

Ads

News feeds

Singapore Democrat News
Joomla Templates by JoomlaShack