Singapore Democrats

Home Perspective Special Feature Misconception No. 1: SDP not interested in elections
Misconception No. 1: SDP not interested in elections Print E-mail
Thursday, 16 April 2009

Singapore Democrats

Several weeks ago, we published a piece entitled Misconceptions about the Singapore Democrats where we briefly highlighted five areas where Singaporeans often misconceive what we say or do especially because the PAP media refuses to report the truth about the SDP. In this series of articles, we discuss these misconceptions in greater depth starting with this one: The Singapore Democrats are not interested in parliamentary elections.

Nothing could be further from the truth. We are democrats and democrats believe that elections – genuinely free and fair elections – are the only legitimate way citizens win power to become rulers. We have taken part in every election in the past and will continue do so in the future.

The problem is that elections are not free and fair in Singapore. The entire process is controlled and run by the PAP under the guise of the Prime Minister's Office. There are many things wrong with the electoral process:

  • Redrawn constituencies are not announced until the last minute.
  • The GRC system makes it much harder for campaigning.
  • Ballot papers are numbered.
  • The campaign period lasts for only nine days.
  • There is no independent election commission to check the abuses of the PAP such as buying votes through issuing of shares and threatening voters through HDB upgrading. The prime minister in a rare moment of honesty admitted that he needs to "fix" the opposition and "buy" votes.


All this does not even include the fact that the entire media is in the hands of the PAP making it near impossible for voters to read and hear the alternative views.

Then there is the ever looming threat of the ISD and lawsuits which terrify the people so much so that opposition parties find it extremely difficult to recruit members, much less get them to stand as candidates.

The truth is that, under such circumstances, it is impossible for the opposition to make any meaningful inroads into Parliament. But the PAP wants Singaporeans to continue to believe that it is possible for the opposition to win elections under a system that it controls so that we will continue to play the game under its rules – and lose every time.

Now we even learn that the Government intends to turn to electronic voting machines which are notoriously prone to tampering. Without an independent audit of the computers, can we ever trust the results under such circumstances?

So what should the opposition do? We have a choice: (a) boycott the elections or (b) take part in it. Option (a) is not feasible unless all the opposition parties agree to the boycott and then strategically work to force a reform of the electoral system.

Given the present state of affairs, we are left with only option (b). But even as we participate in the elections, we will not stop there. We will use the opportunity during elections to educate Singaporeans and raise awareness of the need for reform.

This is because reform is a long-term endeavour and cannot be brought about simply by taking part in the PAP-controlled elections. This is the reality that Singaporeans must be aware of.

One day when elections are truly free and fair, we are confident that we will win the elections. Until then, we have to keep fighting on all fronts, elections or otherwise.

 

Share this article:
Facebook Technorati Stumble It! Newsvine Reddit Del.icio.us Digg This!
Comments (6)
  • sanusijama - Well Said, SDP
    Sometimes following the Holy Book,
    I think Singaporeans must be left to
    hit right bottom before they wake up to realise that they have sold their souls to satan by being apathetic and only looking after their animal needs, never for the greater good.
  • Tikam Tikam Girl - Broader Struggle
    The broader struggle of the SDP is commendable.Indeed one of the worst thing to happen to a wealthy country like Singapore is this curb of our free speech. SDP should never flinch from being the freest of space anywhere. That is success in itself. And every member, supporter must be in tune with that.No stones should be unturned to ensure all understand the desperate need for free speech....not only from the soapbox but in real life.Also all must respect the learning curve in that direction.
  • Lam Ah Pek - Cultural Patterns
    Just don't forget the cultural patterns
    have been made reactionary and spiritless. No spirit how to have democratic reforms or any glimpse of a more human society.
  • sdpmirror - SDP comes in last
    Do you guys read the onlinecitizen? Oh we love that site!

    In a recent poll conducted there, they asked which party readers wanted to contest Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC - WP, SDA or the SDP. Low's WP came up tops, Chiam's SDA came in second. SDP came in last.

    There is hope yet for Singapore.

    We are looking forward to a three cornered fight in the GRC. We have a little bet among ourselves on the outcome - will SDP just lose, or lose its deposit?
  • AnnA - sdpmirror
    Oh.. you are such an instigator. Are you from PAP?
  • Robox
    Re: [color=red]"The GRC system makes it much harder for campaigning."[/color]

    The GRC system is also unconstitutional because it breaches Article 12 (the legal equality clause) of the Constitution.

    The GRC system was devised specifically with the 'JBJ threat' and other like minded individuals in mind.

    In effect, it has created an unlevel playing field for other political parties to even have a fighting chance at government.

    Singapore's badly massacred Constitution is unusual in that it codifies the electoral system; few, if any, other Constitutions worldwide do that.

    The rationale for that codification is clear: an irreversible entrenchment of PAP rule with obstacles in the way of recourse should Singaporeans decide on a non-PAP government.

    Obstacles like a violent overthrow of a non-PAP government, which has been given tacit approval by no less than the personage of Lee Kuan Yew.

    I might point out another of the many follies of PAP 'governance'.

    The legislative process in Singapore is such that ground realities [i]do[/i] inform the law making process.

    (Higher up in the hierachy of the sources of law in order of precedence are a) the Constitution; b) the Statutes; and c) judge-made laws - ground reality as a source of law making may rank lower than all the above but remain an important source of law.)

    Did the 'JBJ threat' constitute enough of a ground reality for the making of constitutional laws that resulted in the codification of the GRC system?

    Heck, did the civil disobedience campaign by the SDP - described in Parliament by law minister Captain Kangaroo Shanmugam as conducted by a tiny group performing 'farcical antics' - constitute enough of a ground reality to enact the Public Order Act?

    This is how the PAP continues unabated in its massacre by stragulating Singaporeans with more and more brutal legialation; this is how the PAP has abused the legislative function that it has been entrusted and empowered with.
Please login or register to post your comments.
 

Latest Videos

Dr Chee Soon Juan's address at SDP's 30th Anniversary Dinner
by SingaporeDemocrats

You need a Flash Player enabled browser to view this YouTube video
youtube link
Share this article:
Facebook Technorati Stumble It! Newsvine Reddit Del.icio.us Digg This!
 
SDP's 30th Anniversary Dinner
by SingaporeDemocrats

You need a Flash Player enabled browser to view this YouTube video
youtube link
Share this article:
Facebook Technorati Stumble It! Newsvine Reddit Del.icio.us Digg This!
 


 

Other languages

Banner
Banner
Banner

Awesome Words

Little minds are interested in the extraordinary; great minds in the commonplace.

Elbert Hubbard

Act Now

More options
 
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
 

Ads

News feeds

Singapore Democrat News
Joomla Templates by JoomlaShack